Major League Soccer - State of the League preview
So on Thursday afternoon Don Garber will address the media with his State of the League address and while I don't expect any of the more controversial topics to be addressed I do think there are a few things we can count on:
- The Success of the Designated Player - As more teams have added DP's the impact on the pitch has been greater as well, and while no team has won MLS Cup (yet) with a DP on their roster, I am willing to be that trend ends next weekend.
- The Success of the New Playoff Format - Finally a MLS Cup with a team from the Eastern Conference and Western Conference will face off for the Championship. This will be the first time since 2007 that each conference is represented. I for one still dislike the format of Wildcards and the reality is that the #1 team will be playing the overall #7 team.
- The Success of the New TV Deal - I have to say that this is the one area that I think is actually a huge success of this year. The move to Versus or NBC Sports Net will be a huge one that will instantly double the exposure of the league over Fox Soccer.
- Success of World Football Challenge - There were some great teams and great matches that brought out fans in huge numbers. No mention of the debacle in Vancouver will be made.
- Schedule changes for 2012 - I am not sure if this topic will be hit or not but I am sure a question will be asked or generic comment made. It is almost a lock that there will not be a balanced schedule in 2012, the question is how much will they screw up the schedule trying to get their "rivalry" on?
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
MLS as a league
Until the MLS does some serious thinking to find a way to improve the poor officiating, The league will still be consdered a 2nd rate league. I truely believe the poor officiating is one of a couple deterents of keeping the good players here, and good players coming to MLS.
Defense of a second franchise in NYC
I think that the long-term plan of the league is to go well beyond 20 teams. I think this is not a crazy nor unrealistic plan, as US-Canadian professional sports leagues commonly have about 30-32 teams in them, and if we are starting franchises off with 20K stadiums, then I think there are plenty of potential markets out there.
With a long-term plan of 30-ish teams in the league, it makes sense to have a second team in NYC. If that is going to happen eventually, I think it makes sense to have it sooner rather than later, in the hopes that both teams can be well supported. IMO, one of the worst things that happened in baseball was giving the Yankees over a decade with New York all to themselves. The Yankees are going to have to screw up in the worst possible way for the Mets to ever come close to catching them in popularity/revenue. Yes, MLS is single entity and has ways to keep one team from dominating the league, but splitting the revenue in NYC between two teams is another way to aid competitive balance.
I don't believe
I simply don’t believe we will go to 30-32 teams withing the next decade, sorry I just don’t see it. We have 3 teams that struggle to get 10K to matches, I believe that 20 is a great number and I would stop there with expansion, until you have TV ratings and attendance numbers maxed at the teams that already exist. This may involve moving teams, but come on they are talking about trying to ferry fans to matches in NYC if they go with Randall Island, really they won’t take a train to Red Bull Arena to see TH14, but you think they will take a ferry to see someone play.
The single minded approach, to the point of hiring a full time person to pursue a team in New York shows that MLS leadership can’t be trusted with the good of the league. They haven’t done that for Miami, Las Vegas, Atlanta, Orlando, Detroit, Minneapolis, St. Louis or any other market, clearly their personal bias has influenced their decision making ability and their ability to lead without bias.

by 










